Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> mi.base.textwidth += 2 * TEXT_TO_INSET_OFFSET;
>
> The last time I did this for the collapsable inset, I needed to
adjust mi.base.textwidth the same > way as dim.wid. Please test and make
this change:
>
> mi.base.textwidth += TEXT_TO_INSET_OFFSET / 2;
I haven't changed this setting. But this needn't to be changed as the
code order is this:
labelwidth_ += 2 * TEXT_TO_INSET_OFFSET;
dim.wid = labelwidth_;
...
mi.base.textwidth -= dim.wid;
...
dim.wid += TEXT_TO_INSET_OFFSET / 2;
mi.base.textwidth += 2 * TEXT_TO_INSET_OFFSET;
So mi.base.textwidth has already the changed size.
I am not so sure of that and the new bug 3225 is an indication that
something is going wrong here...
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3225
Abdel.
