Has this patch been applied in the mean-time?
Michael
Georg Baum schrieb:
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On 1/30/07, Georg Baum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand why we need to create an absolute path here:
Because in 1.5.0svn (but not 1.4.4svn) we get:
Assertion triggered in lyx::support::FileName::FileName(const
std::string&) by failing check "empty() || absolutePath(name_)" in file
filename.C:47
if we don't have an absolute path.
Ah, I assumed that getLatexName always returned a relative path. Now I
understand that you where getting this assert because of the relative path.
The support/FileName class basically prohibits any non-absolute paths.
Yes, it does that on purpose.
I think addPath is to add two paths, we want addName.
AFAIK it does not matter in this case because name is relative.
So, what do you think of the patch below:?
Perfect. I can't apply it now, since it is inline end gets mangled by my
mailer, but unless somebody else beats me to it I'll do it tonight.
Georg
