On Monday 15 January 2007 6:29:14 am Harshula wrote:
> >
> >   I am sorry for taking so long. :-)
>
> No probs.

  It seems that I need 2 weeks for each reply. ;-)

> >   This patch is right, I don't know why I did not think of it right at
> > the time I have implemented the new scheme. So I have returned to the
> > place where I coded it to guarantee the same initial conditions... ;-)
>
> Physically or Psychologically? :-)

  Both, probably. :-)

  I was in the same place in Dublin where I wrote the original code. :-)

> >   My I ask you for a permission to include your code into LyX?
> >   One example can be found here:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg106786.html
>
> I (Harshula Jayasuriya) hereby grant permission to licence my
> contributions to LyX under the Gnu General Public Licence, version 2 or
> later
>
> >   I will apply it to 1.5.0.
> >
> >   Jean-Marc may I apply this to 1.4.x? It closes one bugzilla entry. :-)
>
> BTW, What's the bugzilla number? Please do apply it to both. Then I
> don't have to keep a patched build of Lyx 1.4.3. ;-)

http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841

I have applied the fix to both 1.4.4 and 1.5.0svn.

> cya,
> #

Thank you for your contribution and do not hesitate reporting bugs (and 
fixes ;-) ).

  Regards,
-- 
José Abílio

Reply via email to