On Monday 15 January 2007 6:29:14 am Harshula wrote: > > > > I am sorry for taking so long. :-) > > No probs.
It seems that I need 2 weeks for each reply. ;-) > > This patch is right, I don't know why I did not think of it right at > > the time I have implemented the new scheme. So I have returned to the > > place where I coded it to guarantee the same initial conditions... ;-) > > Physically or Psychologically? :-) Both, probably. :-) I was in the same place in Dublin where I wrote the original code. :-) > > My I ask you for a permission to include your code into LyX? > > One example can be found here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg106786.html > > I (Harshula Jayasuriya) hereby grant permission to licence my > contributions to LyX under the Gnu General Public Licence, version 2 or > later > > > I will apply it to 1.5.0. > > > > Jean-Marc may I apply this to 1.4.x? It closes one bugzilla entry. :-) > > BTW, What's the bugzilla number? Please do apply it to both. Then I > don't have to keep a patched build of Lyx 1.4.3. ;-) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841 I have applied the fix to both 1.4.4 and 1.5.0svn. > cya, > # Thank you for your contribution and do not hesitate reporting bugs (and fixes ;-) ). Regards, -- José Abílio