On 1/28/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, this should not happen. Dvipost comes with a Makefile that installs
> everything for you (on Unix, on Windows, it is installed by the installer
> AFAIK). Anyway, people seem to do all sorts of things.
The makefile generated by configure --prefix=/usr/local/john/dvipost-1.1 was
non-functional.
I've reported this bug, but I had to build and install dvipost by hand.
> > Shall I resubmit with a check only for latex?
> Yes. However, since dvipost actually _has_ to be installed before the
OK, here are the new patches:
--- 1.4.4svn ---
Index: converter.C
===================================================================
--- converter.C (revision 16845)
+++ converter.C (working copy)
@@ -579,6 +579,10 @@
buffer.busy(true);
buffer.message(_("Running LaTeX..."));
+ if ( (command.find("latex ")==0) && buffer.params().output_changes ) {
+ Alert::warning(_("Changes not highlighted"), _("LyX needs
pplatex to highlight changes\nInstall dvipost (including pplatex) and
reconfigure"));
+ }
+
runparams.document_language = buffer.params().language->babel();
// do the LaTeX run(s)
--- 1.5.0svn ---
Index: converter.C
===================================================================
--- converter.C (revision 16897)
+++ converter.C (working copy)
@@ -596,6 +596,10 @@
buffer.busy(true);
buffer.message(_("Running LaTeX..."));
+ if ( (command.find("latex ")==0) && buffer.params().outputChanges ) {
+ Alert::warning(_("Changes not highlighted"), _("LyX needs
pplatex to highlight changes\nInstall dvipost (including pplatex) and
reconfigure"));
+ }
+
runparams.document_language = buffer.params().language->babel();
// do the LaTeX run(s)
