Peter Kümmel wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >>> In short: Could I apply attached patch >> It does not look OK: <> is for system stuff, "" for our own. It should be >> possible to do the same as autotools do in cmake (just replacw the >> symlinks by copies and add a rule to update these copies when the original >> files change). >> >> >> Georg >> > > OK, I've hoped to avoid the copies. > A other solution would be to force the including of the correct header, > when I could figure it out how to do it with gcc (is there a command line > option?) then I will first try this way. >
seems it is '-include' -- Peter Kümmel
