Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
Michael Gerz wrote:
Abdel, Jean-Marc,
here is my first attempt to incorporate a simple & efficient DEPM
into accept/reject change.
I like it. If it works, I would suggest to try to share some code
between the two DEPMs. There are some cases where this new DEPM would
be preferable over the old one (those where we artificially create a
dummy cursor).
Both versions of DEPM follow the same overall logic but the code looks
fundamentally different. I don't think it makes sense to refactor the
code (but to keep both methods next to each other).
Michael
