>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> So that means that if the command is robust we don't need
Lars> a | Lars> \protect even if it is in a moving argument? | |
Lars> That's it. Why protect something which is robust, after all?
Lars> And then we are back at my point that need_protect is not a very
Lars> good name, as that implies that a protect is always needed.
Lars> moving_arg might be better.
Isee what you mean. I should have used MovingArg as name in the layout
file when I introduced it. Do you think we should change the layout
format to make things clearer? Also, fragile should be replaced by
moving_arg for all insets.
JMarc
