Kornel Benko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is very fishy here.
> If I replace the call with:
> string a("");
> Buffer buffer(a, false);
> then it compiles.
>
> On the other hand
> string a();
> Buffer buffer(a, false);
> yields to
> CutAndPaste.C:676: error: no matching function for call to
`lyx::Buffer::Buffer
> (std::string (&)(), bool)'
> buffer.h:73: error: candidates are: lyx::Buffer::Buffer(const lyx::Buffer&)
> buffer.h:92: error: lyx::Buffer::Buffer(const std::string&,
> bool)
That's not fishy at all.
string a("");
defines a variable "a" and initializes it with "". The same thing is achieved
more elegantly and less expensively with:
string a;
By way of contrast,
string a();
is a declaration of a function "a" that takes no arguments and returns a
string...
If you look a little closely at the error message, you'll see that the
compiler is even trying to tell you that.
Regards,
Angus
