On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 04:16:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > >On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 13:07 +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >>Martin Vermeer wrote: > >> > >>>Yes, and a working patch to take it into use is found under the Bugzilla > >>>item (at least is _was_ working then... even tested it). > >>Great, I did not know that. > >> > >>>I am open to both solutions, but be aware of the risks doing this close > >>>to a release. And of course, lyx2lyx should be adapted, etc. New format > >>>(I think). > >>The lyx2lyx stuff would not be difficult I guess. My opinion: If a patch > >>exists already, and if it was working, then use that. We are not so close > >>to a release IMHO that this is too risky. I would not propose such changes > >>anymore after the first beta is out, but we are not ready yet to do a > >>beta. > > > >OK give it a try then! > > The patch does not apply cleanly... > > Abdel.
The one attached to my mail does for me. The one on Bugzilla indeed does not... - Martin
pgpCBRY5VSpHR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
