On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:13:01PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > >What's the plan with the icons? I see that there's a desire to standardize > >their sizes, but what's the preferred size? 22x22 or 20x20? Please don't > >pipe in with 16x16 or somesuch. The files in lib/images seem to fall into > >three flavours: 20x20, 22x22 and 24x24. Those in lib/images/math are much > >more heterogeneous. Is there any desire to standardize them too? > > > >A quick browse of the internet shows that SVG is *not* the way to go for > >these small icons and that a single bitmap size really *is* the best > >solution. However, does anyone have a recommended strategy to follow to > >get there? A quick play with ImageMagick's convert tool: > > > > convert -resize '22x22' layout_Itemize.xpm angus.xpm > > If you are going to touch all icons I suggest that we switch to png now.
And declare icons a "Gui thing". Andre'