Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Gregor> Thinking a bit further, this could be solved by another option
> Gregor> for tex2lyx to specify which literate programing file format
> Gregor> would be chosen. I suggest noweb for default name instead of
> Gregor> literate as literate is far more general than noweb. For
> Gregor> Sweave file format name sweave could be chosen. 
> 
> Is there any reason to have a sweave-article and a noweb-article
> class? What would the difference be between the two? It seems to me
> that it would be better to pick a tool in Document>Settings to choose
> a literate programming program.

Such implementation would be the cleanest since only chosen literate programming
format would be available at the moment. However there still needs to be a way
to handle (tex2lyx or somethingelse2lyx, layout file and specific wavers and
tanglers) chosen literate programming approach - i.e. noweb, nuweb, cweb, ...
and finnaly my ranting about sweave.

Gregor


Reply via email to