On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:33:20PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:37:14PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:08:56AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >>>> Here a totally superfluously patch:
> >>> Erm.
> >>>
> >>>> +void Splash::finish(int secs)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +        if (qsp == 0)
> >>>> +                return;
> >>>> +        QTime t = QTime::currentTime().addSecs(secs);
> >>>> +        while (t > QTime::currentTime())
> >>>> +        {
> >>>> +        }
> >>>> +        delete qsp;
> >>>> +}
> >>> A busy loop?
> >> Who cares?
> > 
> > I do.
> > 
> > Especially since QSplashScreen gives you all you need to setup a decent
> > splshscreen - provided that's something that's really needed.
> > 
> >>> Are you aware of QSplashScreen?
> >> Have a look at the patch again.
> > 
> > Why do you need to wrap it then.
> 
> Because I wanna start it in non-frontend code.

Don't we call a frontend specific init function pretty early anyway?
Why not start the frontend-specific splash from there?

Andre'

Reply via email to