Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Michael Gerz wrote:
| > | > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | >
| > | >> IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| > | >> a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
| > | >> NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
| > | >>
| > | > Lars, I am a careful man :-)
| > | >
| > | > Right now, I am checking the state of the 1.4 and 1.5 translations
| > | > on a case-by-case basis. If the 1.4 translations are better (for
| > | > many languages they are significantly better!), I will remerge.
| > | > Otherwise, I won't.
| > | >
| > | > I will put nb.po on my black list.
| > | Any particular problem with nb.po? Helge Hafting
| >
| > No. Only that it is missing translations and have a few fuzzy entries.
| >
| > I am working slowly on them help would be appreciated.
| >
| I can look at it, like I did for 1.3. It should be simpler now, with
| only one frontend.
| Should I start with the nb.po that is in lyx1.5svn right now, or
| should I wait
| for some merge from 1.4?

I am not planning any merge from 1.4 for nb.po. So IMHO you should
just use what is in Ãlyx1.5svn right now.

-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to