On Monday 30 October 2006 1:04 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> Some of the bugs have trivial fixes. There are two enhancements > >> that could be applied to 1.5 instead (save all files and show > >> modified files in buffer list). And some bugs could probably be > >> moved to later. > > José> I welcome those in 1.5. > > OK. Does this apply to adding Save all and modified files indicator? > This is not something we _need_, but the patches are there and look > simple.
At this stage yes. The rationale is that it is easier to put some of those code now than to delay everything for after 1.5.0. > José> At some point we need to decide that 1.4 is in deep frozen > José> state and target those bugs to 1.5. > > José> What do you think Jean-Marc? > > I think that for many of the bugs targeted to 1.4.x, the fixes would > be simple and thus could apply equally to 1.4.x or 1.5. OTOH, more > complicated changes should be 1.4.x only. Here you meant 1.5.x, I think. :-) > However, the advantage of > the 1.4.x target is that it identifies many small bugs that could be > fixed in a 1.5 polishing phase (but which are not regressions wrt 1.4). When do you propose that phase to be? After the alpha release? > José> 1.4.4 with all scheduled work and 1.4.5 for the last 1.4 > José> release before 1.5 and with lyx2lyx backported? > > Yes, plus the small things that make sense. In any case, I think there > is no 'big' change that should be added to 1.4 (well, I will apply > char-transpose, for example, because it is localized). I agree on all accounts. :-) > JMarc -- José Abílio
