On Tuesday 24 October 2006 6:46 am, Michael Gerz wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> >1.5 Features:
> >- Unicode / new encodings.
> >- Multiple windows.
> >- Change tracking
> >- Sessions
> >
> >- What am I missing more?
>
> - Outlook?
> - Improved dialogs (some 1.4/qt3 dialogs are a PITA)?

  OK, I added those topics to my list. I have decided to use LyX to write 
it. :-)

> >How much time do the
> >respective owners expect to need to have the new features in such a state
> >that they can be presented to users without having them screaming away?
>
> For change tracking, it will take about two weeks for basic operations
> and another two weeks for more complicated stuff (e.g. end-of-par
> handling). This is a conservative guess and I assume that I will be the
> only one working on CT.

  OK.

> > On the other hand
> >we need a quick release, or else all the flurry in the mailing list was
> >useless, so I suggest a deadline for the alpha release of three weeks.
> > That is Monday, 13 November 2006.
>
> Alpha (not beta) in three weeks sounds good.
>
> What about all thoses bugzilla entries? We should be able to drastically
> reduce the number of entries.

  According to a message from Asger that I have not read yet this does not 
seem so high.

  I think that the purpose of the alpha release is to have people testing and 
when finding bugs inserted them in bugzilla. This will give us a better 
understanding of what needs to be done.

> >A: I am not Denmark but I will answer this. The role to follow here is the
> >stable series. Not all fixes are welcome at all times, special at the last
> >day or minute. :-)
>
> Please be a bit more generous than we were for 1.4.0. When 1.4.0 was
> released (broken, slow, ...) there was a stack of about 50 patches. This
> should never happen again!

  My purpose is to avoid that.

> Textual changes (translator work) should be possible even at a very late
> stage.

  I will try to take that into account in our release schedule.

> Michael
>
> PS: I like your email! Good points and a clear vision!

  Thanks. :-)
-- 
José Abílio

Reply via email to