Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Michael> For simplicity, we could assume that adjacent changes of the
Michael> _same_ author are always merged, where the later time is
Michael> preserved. In this case, the changetime indicates the latest
Michael> change in the given section. This leads to less changes and
Michael> the changetime would still have some meaning.
It looks like a good idea (but of course, this is until somebody comes
and complains about it!)
OK, since nobody has complained yet, I will follow this strategy. Due to
the fact that changes to CT are quite simple nowadays, we can switch to
something more sophisticated later (provided that the solution is not
too sophisticated for the average user!)
Michael
