Peter Kümmel wrote:
Back to start: It's just a reference initialization: int i0; int & i = i0; int & r1 = i; int & r2 = *(&i); ... Where's the problem?
No problem per see. I just find it a bit ugly but I have no problem with it. Abdel.
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Back to start: It's just a reference initialization: int i0; int & i = i0; int & r1 = i; int & r2 = *(&i); ... Where's the problem?
No problem per see. I just find it a bit ugly but I have no problem with it. Abdel.