Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >>> Quite a few bugs in the qt4 frontend though.
| > Abdelrazak> Man, that's an entirely new frontend. Dialogs bugs are
| > Abdelrazak> easy to solve. Dialog bugs have almost nothing to do with
| > Abdelrazak> my cleanups. You could even help here. I never said it was
| > Abdelrazak> perfect and I always called for help. I _don't_ plead
| > Abdelrazak> guilty for the pseudo situation that we face here.
| > It is unfortunately too late to have this point of view. As long as
| > there was a qt3 frontend as backup, it was OK to say that we should be
| > nice with qt4 because that it is so new. Now that it has pushed all of
| > its siblings out of the nest, each and every bug in the qt4 frontend
| > is a regression wrt LyX 1.4, nothing else.
| > If it was not ready, it was not wise to push it.
|
| I _never_ advocate to remove qt3.
Just stop caring about it...
Good.
I think you are rewriting history now...
Look at the archive, I stated multiple times that it was fine with me
that qt3 and gtk stays in trunk. What I wanted was a clear permission
from you that I could stop any development on those two. I never had
this permission.
| And I repeat myself: dialog bugs are far far far easier to solve than
| core bugs. So it's not like we are in such hurry with regard to qt4.
Yes we are. Qt4 is now the only frontend should so every problem
should be fixed pronto.
I am on it.
Abdel.
