> Maybe I wasn't clear (that isn't difficult ;) I am not against the char resolution > attributes, I simply think that we should have middle range attributes that are > perhaps best descrived as insets. And logical structures as Contry or Name should > be one of those cases. > > Clear now? No, it's not clear why we should spent energy to impose such a restriction? Language might be word boundary property (this is not certain), but I don't think that it's important enough to reflect this in the data structure. My gut feeling says that this is too complex to be worth it. I understand that it is important to have "middle range attributes", but it is not important to impose that they should have word boundaries only. I think it's more important to recognize the similarity with font attributes, just like HTML does with the <span> property, and thus reduce complexity. Greets, Asger
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Dekel Tsur
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Allan Rae
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Dekel Tsur
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Dekel Tsur
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Juergen Vigna
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Dekel Tsur
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Allan Rae
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Dekel Tsur