>   Maybe I wasn't clear (that isn't difficult ;) I am not against the char resolution
> attributes, I simply think that we should have middle range attributes that are
> perhaps best descrived as insets. And logical structures as Contry or Name should
> be one of those cases.
> 
>   Clear now?

No, it's not clear why we should spent energy to impose such a restriction?

Language might be word boundary property (this is not certain), but I don't 
think that it's important enough to reflect this in the data structure. My 
gut feeling says that this is too complex to be worth it.

I understand that it is important to have "middle range attributes", but
it is not important to impose that they should have word boundaries only.
I think it's more important to recognize the similarity with font attributes,
just like HTML does with the <span> property, and thus reduce complexity.

Greets,

Asger

Reply via email to