Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote: > A trivial (looking) patch to correct inset behavior, which is broken > with revision 15068. Without this patch, it is not possible to modify > an existing inset. All modifications processed as new index. (see > lyxfunc.C:1420)
Congratulations Ugras, I think the fix is correct. > I will be glad if somebody review the attached patch (and submit to > svn if it is correct ) Abdel, please do that if you agree, since svn blames you for the '0'. I noticed the compiler warning about the unused variable "inset", but was too lazy to look at it. Conclusion: Listen to your compiler and do not add code with "expected" warnings. Georg
