Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Samstag, 23. September 2006 17:21 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
| > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Something seems to be wrong with writing in mathed. The unicode stuff
| > | should really be fixed soon.
| >
| > Yes. Any proposal on how to move forward?
|
| I have still the patch for wide streams. I think we should use them for
| document export. I am not sure yet how we would handle latex export,
| because we may need not only utf8, but I can imagine that we can do that
| with wide streams and another codecvt facet, too. This certainly needs
| some more investigation.
I think we should to it in a even more explicit and direct way.
Mapping from unicode codepoints to latex commands and fonts.
Yes, it is going to be hairy unless there exists latex support for
utf8/utf16 etc.
| Then I think that mathed can be converted to docstring more or less
| completely. That would probably fix the number problems.
|
| The other places that are not yet docstring are IMO not so important and
| can be converted as needed.
|
| What I do not want at all is another discussion about conversion step by
| step vs. global search/replace. It should be decided once and for all what
| method is used, and then it should not be questioned anymore.
Agree. and my vote is on step by step.
(as has been my intention even from the beginning.)
--
Lgb
