>>>>> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Peter Kümmel wrote: >> It would not be a 1.4.3 release, but without this patch it makes no >> sense to release on Windows. So we could make it 1.4.3.1 or >> something like that. Joost> Windows releases already have an additional number. The first Joost> one will be called 1.4.3-1. Yes, I think we should not be too picky about what the version numbers are. What you should do is make available on the wiki (for example) the patch that you applied to 1.4.3. JMarc
