On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >If you're there you can as well call the method a 'slot' and connect it
> >to an, erm, 'signal'.
> 
> I would be OK with that but only if we sanitize a bit how the lfun are 
> used. Emitting a dozen boost signal on a simple keystroke won't be fast 
> I guess.

A dozen would be no problem...

> On these cases, calling out these "slots" directly without 
> passing through the LFUN machinery would be the right thing to do.

As long as communication is solely within the kernel, direct call is
certainly in order.

Andre'

Reply via email to