On 31 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:

> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | And compile times will increase by at least double.  At least that's my
> | experience so far -- assuming you have plenty of memory and don't start
> | swapping.
> 
> I compile without -g and without optimization.

Whatever for?  Surely,  you'd want -g at the least to find those bugs
that the rest of us insert in the code to slow you down.

> | > Not only xtl requires exceptions, conforming omplementations of the
> | > C++ standard library also requires it.
> | 
> | But most STL implementations can work without exceptions.  It should be
> | fairly straight forward to modify xtl to also compile -fno-exceptions.
> | It will still require -frtti though no matter what you do to it..
> 
> I don't see the _real_ point in avoiding exceptions at all costs.

Not at all costs,  just to be able to if desired.

Allan. (ARRae)

Reply via email to