On 31 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | And compile times will increase by at least double. At least that's my
> | experience so far -- assuming you have plenty of memory and don't start
> | swapping.
>
> I compile without -g and without optimization.
Whatever for? Surely, you'd want -g at the least to find those bugs
that the rest of us insert in the code to slow you down.
> | > Not only xtl requires exceptions, conforming omplementations of the
> | > C++ standard library also requires it.
> |
> | But most STL implementations can work without exceptions. It should be
> | fairly straight forward to modify xtl to also compile -fno-exceptions.
> | It will still require -frtti though no matter what you do to it..
>
> I don't see the _real_ point in avoiding exceptions at all costs.
Not at all costs, just to be able to if desired.
Allan. (ARRae)