Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Yes, but perhaps we should add a way to insert any unicode codepoint
| > and/or sequences. Both numerical and perhaps also textual.
|
| > unicode-insert #ffff #0302
| > unicode-inserr non-visible-char combining-latin-acute
|
| Good idea. Would be nice to be able to do soill enable us to also bolt
| on a dialog to enable these things to be composed.
|
| > something like this would superseed the accent lfuns imo.
|
| But it doesn't negate his opinion that we still need an inset to hold
| multiple code points that can be represented as a single
| grapheme/glyph. Or do I miss something?
Depends. We could, but it might require too much work, separate the
paragraph text and the "broken" paragraph text better. So onnly the
container with the broken test would need to know (and create)
containers for codepoints into graphemes.
| Incidentally, that's "supercede".
Hmm da hmm... note to self: Don't to other things while typing.
--
Lgb
