On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:22:45AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:10:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:40:46PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > I don't like LyX with Qt4/Win native because: > > > - it does not fit well in a Cygwin environment > > > - the lyxpipe cannot be used > > > - lyxclient doesn't work > > > - I am better at writing shell wrappers than batch files > > > - Posix is better > > > > The shell/batch point is not valid. There's no reason why LyX/Win native > > should not work with shell scripts. > > You mean appending a .sh to each script and associating it with bash? > Bleach...
I am saying native LyX/Win works well in a cygwin environment. > > You have a point wrt to the lyxpipe/client. However, RPC works also on > > Win*. > > You mean *would* work... We use RPC for windows at work. Some fairly outdated version from Sun IIRC but it works. > Then I would like that my symlinks are recognized, that I don't have > to use ridiculous quoting when passing arguments to programs, and I > could continue. No, thank you, if I have a choice I prefer the posix > environment that cygwin grants me. That POSIX environment works wuqally well with LyX/Cyggwin and LyX/Win native. Andre'
