On Tuesday 12 September 2006 11:51, José Matos wrote: > So if you can support qt 3.0 with very few effort we should do it. :-)
Sorry I meant *we* not *you*. My point is that there are several places in code where we test for qt < 3.1 and for some reason that chunk avoided that check. If the fix is just a matter of adding another conditional code at that point, and the changes required are small then we should fix. Else it is easier to change the documentation as you suggested. -- José Abílio
