Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > After this patch I don't think it pays to fiddle a lot more with
| > | > unicode.C. Except moving away from iconv that is.
| > | | And switching to docstring I hope...
| > | | If not, I am asking you for the tenth time: why not?
| > The interface was supposed to be as lose to an array of elements as
| > possible, to fit iconv and the users we have of it. Why the obsession
| > about moving these simple "wrapper" functions to docstring?
|
| Don't you see that there are unnecessary copies? Why using vector if
| our only use of those conversion is for docstring containers?
But it is not.
--
Lgb
