Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Samstag, 9. September 2006 11:50 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
|
| > Why can't enchant be added without touching the existing spellcheckers?
|
| I suggested that some days ago, but Jean-Marc argued that it is too much
| work if the others are supposed to be removed.
But we don't know that yet.
How much time do you think you need to take a decision? When you make up
your mind in one or two years, just tell me and I'll do the change. The
code in ControlSpellChecker is awful and really too complicated and I am
not willing to work with that.
So, I will just revert my tree and be done with it. Why the most simple
decision are so complicated within this project?
Abdel.
