On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:37:27AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > That's exactly the problem indeed. My earlier cleanup work is heading > toward "the frontend use the kernel as a library" design. Once this is > achieved, splitting out the toolkit specific frontend should be easy. So > clearly the first candidate for a new dll is the code in frontend/qt4/.
Doesn't that contradict each other? Shouldn't there be a lyxkernel.dll and the frontend using this? > The controller will need some cleanup before it could be split up. I still think merging the controller into the frontend specific code would make things a grest deal simpler, more flexible _and_ smaller, even when using two frontends... Andre'
