Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| For my patch I assumed that for any line beginning with '!' there is a
| matching line beginning with 'l.' , (not necessarily the next line).
| I think that Lars meant that this assumption is not correct.

I misread you. I think you are right. But we sure that there is a way
out of the while loop. At some point we have to realize that we are
not able to find a "l."

| I've tried to find an example for this by generating various errors,
| but haven't come up with such an example.

        Lgb

Reply via email to