On 22 Oct 1999 01:25:43 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| And if you're wise you might consider adding a comment that explains
>| why this is standard conformant and why C-style coding style is frowned
>| upon :-)
>
>Because it is the standard? :-) Surely I could qoute section numbers,
>but would that really help?
>
>Besides it is at the surface that lyxstring is standard conformant. We
>are among other not using character traits.
Well, just make this clear.
And if you have the standard at hand:
Why not cite? I'm sure this will show how ANSIFICATION ismeant to work
and help those a bit who are still afraid of ANSI C++.
Greets,
Arnd
