On Fri, 08 Oct 1999 17:49:20 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>On 07 Oct 1999 19:30:32 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>
>>"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 07:08:37 +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
>>|
>>| >+ MathParInset p = new MathParInset(LM_ST_TEXT);
>>|
>>| Probably a silly question, but I'm a bit confused: Why 'new'?
>>|
>>|
>>| >+ XStoreBuffer(fl_display, xclipboard.c_str(), xclipboard.length(), 0);
>>|
>>| Apart from that just a general remark: Do you try to introduce some
>>| thin abstraction layer on top of all those direct xlib and xforms
>>| calls? So to put all those dirty bits and pieces apart and wrap them
>>| nicely in a 'guiPrimitives.a' or how is it called?
>>|
>>| Moreover it's a fix, so it should become now part of the OS/2 bin.
>>
>>Does this work with
>
>?
>
>>XConvertSelection and XA_PRIMARY?
>>
>>I am not sure that it does.
>
>This prepares for target type conversion of specified window selection.
>You'll need to copy to the buffer anyway. So you probably wanted to
>suggest we should not forget XSetSelectionOwner() to current, the
>SelectionNotify event and the correct handling of this?
But all this is so complicated (errors/bugs are hard to avoid!). IMHO
LyX should only use a generic method, which is an abstraction layer
around supported toolkits.
AH
