On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 08:29:02PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ------- Start of forwarded message -------
> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 17:16:20 +0100 (BST)
> From: Horst G Kausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Gullik_Bj=F8nnes?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Horst G Kausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: new prerelease lyx-1.0.4pre4
> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990803165857.25231D-100000@kacmoody>
> 
> I have just downloaded and built lyx-1.0.4pre4. Four comments so far:
> 
> 1) As I use RedHat 6.0 I build an rpm for it. I noticed that, comtrary to
> lyx 1.0.3,  there is now no longer any stuff installed in
> /usr/share/locale/. Is this correct?

> 2) I tried the DocBook support and found a problem with the <author> tag.
> According to the docbook DTD you are not allowed to have text directly
> inside the author tag. Allowed entities are (amongst others)
> <firstname>, <othername>, <surname>
> These then contain the actual text for the name. Lyx creates a single
> <author> tag with the full name inside. 

  That is not a problem only half the solution ;-)
  This means that you have two choices:

   * nest the firstname and surname inside the author layout. ugly I know
but the present kernel doesn't give any other choice...

   * write in latex font <=> sgml
   <firstname>my first name</firstname> <surname> Doe </surname>


> 3) I used the docbook support from the Cygnus Sourceware. Rpms for that 
> are available from RedHat Software Labs (these actually work with RH6.0)
> and include:
>   nsgml   
>   jade
>   jadetex
>   stylesheets   -- the stylesheets for the dvi and HTML backends
>   psgml         -- sgml emacs mode
> When I use lyx on a docbook article to create a dvi preview I get an
> error: It calls "sgmltools" on the .sgml file instead of nsgml or db2dvi.
> Is this still left over from linuxdoc?

  Well this problem has 2 parts, first the dvi preview isn't yet completly 
adjusted, few rokw, but that is ok...

  Lyx has been using sgmltools to deal with all the backend issues, I am
aware of Cygnus packages, BTW some of the discussion about it has been done
in the sgmltools mailing list.

  The question is this: Do we rely in cygnus packages or sgmltools v2.0
to handle the background?

  Since sgmltools takes cares of some issues that I wouldn't like to deal
in LyX I favour the sgmltools solution.

> 4) Without any documentation on Lyx's docbook support, a sample document
> or template it is difficult to know which features are supported and
> should be tested. Some more info would be appreciated. 

  My fault, I do have a sample document that I forgot to send. As soon as I
find it I will send a copy to the list and to you.

> I'll do some more testing later.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Horst Kausch
> 
>
  José 

Reply via email to