Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> During the last few years I have heard of several people that wanted to do
> this port but AFAIK nobody has done nothing (I hope I'm wrong). Well, this
> is a true step forward.
>
> I have wrote a small testing framework. It has only the main independent
> gui components of the main window (menu, toolbar and minibuffer), so
> you need to run a working lyx *before* to run glyx in order to test these
> components.
[snip]
Beautiful. Thanks for getting the ball rolling. I do, however, worry
about the name, glyx. Maybe it is inevitable, but I would hate to see it
transmute into gnolyx as in "I ain't takin' gnolyx for gnobody" :)
Cheers,
Garst
