> Concerning the thought part below, I just reproduced it so that others
> can comment on it. Personnally, I agree that some message should be
> returned on success, but there may be some applications which rely on
> the fact that nothing is returned.
> 
> So, fellow developpers, any idea?

In order to keep backwards compatibility, we can just introduce a certain
command that will enable the "error messages" on success.

Greets,

Asger

Reply via email to