On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > I think that we should use the same container for all documentation > strings in LyX. Having the LString dedicated for this purpose clears > the semantics immensely, and I would prefer to make LString a global > phenonomem in all contexts that deal with text from a document. I think > our own LString is good enough to be the default string, but having a > less usable string would be an error, IMO. What I think it's an error is that our atomic text data structure gets so tied to a very particular container that, if sometime in the future we find the right container to fit its requierements, we will find unnecesarily difficult to do the move. Greets, Alejandro
- LString or vector? Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: LString or vector? Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: LString or vector? Allan Rae
- Re: LString or vector? Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: LString or vector? Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: LString or vector? Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: LString or vector? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LString or vector? Allan Rae
- Re: LString or vector? Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: LString or vector? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LString or vector? Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: LString or vector? Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: LString or vector? Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: LString or vector? Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: LString or vector? Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LString or vector? Allan Rae
- Re: LString or vector? Asger Alstrup Nielsen