Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of Graphical Tutorial

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

*Alejandro Aguilar Sierra writes:
 | I don't know what is your idea but I think that we should not have
 | a function for each lyx command but just few of them. The most
 | important could be:
 | 
 | (exec-lyx-command "<lyx command> [argument]")
 | 
 | or a shorter name. Some of the necessary new functions are those
 | that currently can't be done without the GUI. For the rest, scheme
 | itself is powerful enough.

I don't agree with you. We should export the lyxfuncs so that they
seem to be builtin-scheme functions:

(buffer-open "test.lyx")

Perhaps we should have a prefix: "lyx-", but I don't think so.

        Lgb