lars lamented, > *Asger Alstrup Nielsen writes: > | The "only" serious problem is to decide whether Python should be > | mandatory or optional. (We have to solve this problem for any > | scripting language which can't be included in the distribution.) > IMO that is bad. The scripting language should be mandatory and > included in the distribution. I can certainly see the value for a standard language for the distribution. But is there any reason that the support wouldn't be for any arbitrary language? --
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of Graph... Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of Graph... Etienne Grossmann
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of Graph... Etienne Grossmann
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of Graph... Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st ver... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Script language (was Re... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version of ... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st version... Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st ver... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Script language (was Re: 1st... Amir Karger
- Re: Script language (was Re... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Script language (wa... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Script language (wa... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Script language (wa... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Script language (wa... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Script language (wa... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Script language (wa... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Script language (wa... Richard E. Hawkins Esq.