On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote: [how apply() + insets works] > There is no bug, as far as I can see... Ahhh.... I misread and didn't realise the loop was in document->apply() iterating over the insets it contained. Silly me :) > Of course, we need to abstract the apply-interface some more, so that we can > apply things that work on different things than ints. (That was the stuff I > listed a few mails back.) Yes I remember it. Allan. (ARRae)
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Allan Rae
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Allan Rae
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Allan Rae
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Allan Rae
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + In... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buf... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buf... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buf... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buf... Lars Gullik Bjønnes