On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:07:16AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > John> This is a mistake: you don't want to split the sequence of menus > John> bound together by the "->". Reason? It breaks the connection > John> between menu name and menu-item name. Yes, it creates ugly > > You can safely break after the arrow, for the same reason that you can > break a compound word (can you in english?). Not quite. You don't break the compound word; you hyphenate it. Then again, you hyphenate non-compound words, too. But the hyphen is always there. Breaking after the arrow, as I said, breaks the connection between menu name and menu-item name. You can't put in a hyphen after the arrow to indicate continuation; that'd look goofy. Oh, NOW I see what you're talking about, J.M. The arrow "->" *is* the hyphen! I'd have to see how it looked in the manuals before giving it the a-Okay, but it *seems* like it might work. -- John Weiss
- The -> arrows in the manual Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Peter Suetterlin
- Re: The -> arrows in the ma... Mate Wierdl
- Re: The -> arrows in t... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows ... Mate Wierdl
- Re: The -> arrows in the ma... John Weiss
- Re: The -> arrows in t... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows ... John Weiss
- Re: The -> arr... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual John Weiss
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows in the ma... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: The -> arrows in t... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows in the manual Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: The -> arrows in the ma... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: The -> arrows in t... Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos