Hi ALL!
Alejandro kindly forwards me some mail he thinks I should be
interested in as so I can follow a bit what you guys are up to :)
(THANKS ALE). The last one was this:
AAS> On 10 Feb 1999, Lars Gullik Bjß8nnes wrote: Joacim is right,
AAS> Juergen rewrote and moved the table stuff to his table inset
AAS> already.
>> Yes, but it has only been moved, not rewritten.
AAS> It seems that you forget that an entirely new *text* inset was
AAS> wrote to support it. That's, IMDNHO, much more than just move
AAS> it. ;)
LGB> The algorithms and structures used on tables have not been changed.
LGB> So you wrote the new inset and moved the tableed.
I think I should also say something to this discussion as it
directly regards the table stuff for which I did a lot of work :)
First of all both of you are RIGHT ;). This means that YES there
is the new text-inset and there is a new tabular-inset and this
both should be used in a good way to redo the table.¼h] files.
And this means also YES I left the table.¼h] stuff mostly unchanged
and in the same mess as it was in 0.13.
But it means NO if you think I did intend to let it be like this.
I never had the sligthest doubt that the table.¼h] stuff has to
be rewritten just I didn't have the time and I just wanted to show
a good way to do it for you to be able to work on this.
Obviously I see you didn't do anything on this till now and you
probably will not do anything till I return home in mid April :)
(I hope you do but you're probably busy doing some other important
suff ;) So if someone what's to give it a try to rewrite this stuff
I'm more than happy, but he should do it in the right direction
righ
