>>>>> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Asger> [Search replace patch]
>> It certainly will not be included into 1.0.x.
Asger> I agree that we should move on to 1.1. However, since it will
Asger> be long before 1.2 appears, I think it's sane to allow a few
Asger> features to go into 1.0.1.
Asger> In particular, I think it's ok to put this replace patch into
Asger> 1.0.1. Before 1.0.0, we said that the patch would go in 1.0.1.
Asger> I don't see why we should change this policy now. After all,
Asger> we want Daniel on the team.
Yes, that was the plan.
Asger> On March 1st, we declare the 1.0.x line dead with the release
Asger> of 1.0.1. But it's not dead before that. (If 1.0.1 turns out
Asger> to be buggy, that's just too bad. So Daniel, please make sure
Asger> that the patch is very correct. Don't rely on other people
Asger> testing it.)
That seems right.
JMarc
