"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> KA> Now do you want the LyX spell checker interface to also throw
> KA> exceptions (with all of them steaming form a common base class
> KA> such as lyx_spell_error) or do you rather it catch all thrown
> KA> exceptions and toggle an error flag or something similar.
>
> KA> It doesn't really make a difference. If you wish for it to throw
> KA> exceptions it will also throw them when an ispell process
> KA> returns an error code.
>
> If we allow it to use exceptions we limit the range of usable
> compilers a great deal. Then we can throw out support for gcc 2.7.x at
> once.
>
Ok than I take it you don't wan to use exceptions as you still wish to
support gcc 2.7.x? Thats fine.
In that case aspell support will only be compiled in if a comptable
compiler is used such as egcs... Otherwise it will use ispell....
PS: Aspell right now requires egcs of gcc 2.8.1 for more than just
exceptions.
--
Kevin Atkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
