[looks great, we all love it, blah blah blah]

I have to agree with Larry on the "emacs-style" thing.
Why not just say "version control for collaborative authoring". 

Anyone who knows what version control is doesn't need to be told it's
emacs-style, while anyone who doesn't know has at least a *chance* of
getting an idea of what it's for if you say the shorter version above. Their
eyes will glaze over if they see emacs-style, IMO.

Also, what makes it emacs-style? vim can do it too, e.g.

-Amir

Reply via email to