>>>>> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've thought of license terms in the past that specifically exclude
>> the FSF . . . but i've never really thought of being explicit about
>> "muttonhead," thought "totalitarian" and "imperialistic" have come
>> up . . .
Asger> I know it's soon Friday, but I want to clarify one thing:
Asger> I will never accept to put my code under a license that
Asger> excludes the FSF (or anybody else.)
... and I'll add that, while being a pain sometimes, FSF does a great
service to the free software community by being so strict about what
free means. Let's face it: the closed form nature of xforms has
hampered the development of LyX.
I've been also annoyed by some statements from RMS and the FSF, but I
think they are right in the long term.
So now let's get this 1.0.0 out and get rid of xforms in 1.1 :)
JMarc
