commit 3042fb2939505d3b59b66111cf227bcb8d29dae9
Author: Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Jul 2 11:35:04 2025 +0200

    lyxbuild: not worth considering -Wpadded
---
 development/lyx-tester/lyxbuild | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/development/lyx-tester/lyxbuild b/development/lyx-tester/lyxbuild
index d85d8b5a76..808bc055cd 100755
--- a/development/lyx-tester/lyxbuild
+++ b/development/lyx-tester/lyxbuild
@@ -628,6 +628,20 @@ else
       # related commits: 0c2a1d81
       CPPFLAGS+=";-Wcast-qual"
 
+      # Did not ask for feedback on lyx-devel yet, since these do not seem good
+      # candidates to address
+      #
+      # might be useful to avoid *some* of these warnings by just rearranging 
the elements from biggest
+      # to smallest.
+      #https://stackoverflow.com/a/52030848/1376404
+      # could in theory add explicit padding, but that seems like a bad idea:
+      # https://stackoverflow.com/a/76107281/1376404
+      # alternative, but not recommended:
+      # https://stackoverflow.com/a/8933773/1376404
+      # great info (and should not always order from largest to smallest!):
+      # 
#https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56761591/how-do-i-organize-members-in-a-struct-to-waste-the-least-space-on-alignment
+      CPPFLAGS+=";-Wno-error=padded"
+
     else
       CPPFLAGS=""
     fi
-- 
lyx-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-cvs

Reply via email to