Either way, that's a bad deal.
-- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940. On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Actually, that is untrue. > Shellworld owners are intent on deciding what email we can and cannot see, > including items an individual may consider spam but they do not, and clearly > the other way around as well. > There is a difference. > its not that we get lots of spam. Instead we end up not getting email the > individual knows should get through, with a third party making the decision. > As an example, my bank cannot reach me at all now. > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > Maybe others can help here, users can install their own copy of > > spamassassin though that needs some work to do it correctly. Another > > possibility may be procmail and that needs some study to set recipes up > > correctly. > > It seems to me shellworld.net is intent on keeping its users open to spam. > > > > > > -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in > > defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that > > order." Ed Howdershelt 1940. > > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > >> Have you a trash folder or junkmail folder? > >> > >> > >> -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in > >> defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that > >> order." Ed Howdershelt 1940. > >> > >> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote: > >> > >>> Agree about spam assassin. > >>> However the owners of shellworld disliked the program, so instead of > >>> individual choice for users, they took the choice away from everyone. > >>> did try to use my password at gmail, likely the code got filtered as > >>> spam..for > >>> which I have no folder. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote: > >>> > >>>> panix.com has both roundcube and squirrelmail but we found both of those > >>>> interfaces are inaccessible for command line users of linux so although I > >>>> could set them up I couldn't access them effectively. That's why I am > >>>> using spamassassin. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> > >>>> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > >>>> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. > >>>> Please use in that order." > >>>> Ed Howdershelt 1940. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi folks, > >>>>> As some may know google is force feeding the removal of access for basic > >>>>> html. > >>>>> For me personally this presents several issues, shellworld is amazing in > >>>>> general, but the owners have removed the right to review spam here all > >>>>> together. > >>>>> There is a thread over at DOS ain't dead about providers who still have > >>>>> web > >>>>> interfaces, using roundcube or squirrel mail, someone even spoke of > >>>>> fastmail. > >>>>> Anyone know of either an email service that incorporates these lower > >>>>> graphics > >>>>> interfaces, or host mail in a way that allows full detailed inbox > >>>>> access > >>>>> in > >>>>> a reliable way. > >>>>> Even Links with its JavaScript touches, and elinks when compiled for > >>>>> JavaScript might be an option, but asking about Lynx in case I have > >>>>> missed > >>>>> a > >>>>> door. > >>>>> Am a bit shaky here, lots of please fit into our disability box, or > >>>>> there > >>>>> is > >>>>> no place for our freakishness stuff in my life lately. > >>>>> I do not want to chance a gmail login, until i know where I am > >>>>> going..shellworld is my alternative address for gmail, and with no spam > >>>>> folder > >>>>> I might miss the two factor code option. > >>>>> Lynx ideas for email? > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Karen > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
