Mouse dixit:
>I think the double-quoted text above is saying that — is defined
>to be not "codepoint 151 in the encoding specified by the
>Content-Type:" but rather "Unicode codepoint 151".
>
>Is that actually true? I don't know; I'm not au courant enough with
No, but the document character set is Unicode in UTF-8 encoding.
In both XML and HTML, numeric (decimal or hexadecimal) entities
are in the document character set.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Yay for having to rewrite other people's Bash scripts because bash
suddenly stopped supporting the bash extensions they make use of
-- Tonnerre Lombard in #nosec
_______________________________________________
Lynx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
