Steffen Nurpmeso dixit: >library. That increased the surprise, because all one needs for >SOCKS5 support, even including the DNS lookup, is to hook >connect(2) -- that is how i did it, as easy as [1]. And in fact
Really? (About DNS. I disbelieve that, especially as the DNS server is on the LAN normally.) >i became inspired by Gaetan Bisson's usocks-06.c, which can be Ugly, but can be used for inspiration. >Wouldn't it be much nicer if there would be a -socks=[HOST]:PORT >command line argument and a simple, always compiled in, wrapper >around connect, just the way i do it (in [1])? Yesplease! I tried to look at enabling SOCKS support, for Tor support, and… there was not even a hint as to which library was the right one, and the one I found was so bloated… bye, //mirabilos -- When he found out that the m68k port was in a pretty bad shape, he did not, like many before him, shrug and move on; instead, he took it upon himself to start compiling things, just so he could compile his shell. How's that for dedication. -- Wouter, about my Debian/m68k revival _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
